Prejudice, A Necessary Evil
85
"Look around! You couldn't find a whiter, safer or better lit part of this city. But this white woman sees two black guys strolling down the sidewalk and her reaction is blind fear. I mean, look at us! Are we dressed like gang-bangers? Huh? No. Do we look threatening? No. In fact, if anybody should be scared around here, it's us: We're the only two black faces surrounded by a sea of over-caffeinated white people, patrolled by the triggerhappy LAPD. So you tell me, why aren't we scared?"
"Because we have guns?"
"You could be right".
These quotes were extracted from the movie 'Crash'. Two African American men remarking on the prejudice they believe others are showing to them, while simultaneously planning a crime- sort of ironic. This is a superb movie about prejudice, stereotyping, profiling, and discrimination based on many of the events occurring in America now.
Whether you admit it, prejudice is all around you, even within you. My goal in writing this is for folks to channel and focus their natural tendency toward prejudice into something more constructive, but certainly not to ignore it based on political correctness. Striving to be politically correct can lead to as much ignorance as blatant and unnecessary prejudice. Lasting prejudice: Holding a grudge for no reason or our parents passed the ignorance down or just from one incident, is not right. Protecting ourselves enough to make informed decisions based on pre-conceived notions and conclusions, such as prejudice, is wise.
In light of recent events, I'm beginning to analyze the necessity of prejudice. To view all prejudice as bad is not something I'm willing to accept.. During Portland, Oregon's tree lighting ceremony before Christmas, 2010, a car bomber was caught in the act, waiting for 10,000 people to show up on a festive holiday event so he could destroy lives and a city. He was following a Muslim terrorist group's plan. The issue here is our logic explains not all Muslims are bad, but some are and the magnitude of danger, when they are, should seriously be considered.
The trend I am seeing within our nation is a common dislike for that culture born from the disregard their people have for our culture. Who is right? Well, neither- not the nice and tidy answer you wanted. Perhaps our prejudice for that culture is based on what is necessary to protect ourselves. I worry someday that Americans will be more afraid to think of themselves as prejudice than to act on a justifiable fears or instincts.
Many Americans are quickly learning more about other cultures and various other political and social issues effecting us. Within the American egocentric mind-set, we can't imagine a culture of individuals who would commit suicide in an effort to plan and kill groups of people. Maybe it's also hard for us to accept a group of people who would disregard our laws and borders. Although this happening and Americans are shrinking in fear of looking prejudice or politically incorrect.
I find myself understanding the nation's growing prejudice against Muslims, terrorist groups, illegal immigrants, and mid-eastern culture. I don't think it is right, but the justification of prejudice as a necessary evil seems more like survival instincts. As an adult with enough knowledge and wisdom through experiences, I have gained judgement and even pre-judgement- sometimes helping me escape a bad situation.
The police and border patrol can't ignore a suspicious looking Hispanic even a mile from the border, they have to act on their prejudice, and profiling, for our safety. The military do it as well because their lives are in danger if they don't ackenowledge their prejudices while on foreign soils. During my high school years I lived near The Projects (one step up from the ghetto) and I learned to focus my prejudice as a combination of instinct and street knowledge.
Prejudice is natural and I believe necessary to react to in some cases. Animals in nature are prejudice as well. I'm not the only one."Ideas have consequences and the banishment of the idea of prejudice has had profound consequences for Western culture," T. Dalrymple explains in his book, "In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas."
"Today, the word prejudice has come to seem synonymous with bigotry; therefore the only way a person can establish freedom from bigotry is by claiming to have wiped his mind free from prejudice," Mr. Dalrymple writes, explaining that concept of "prejudice" (meaning "preconceived judgment or opinion") has suffered from its association with negative discrimination.
Several years ago, while taking psychology courses, I became open-minded about the term prejudice. Psychology will explain prejudice as normal and natural, but will call it "categorizing". Here's how categorizing was explained; a preconceived order and notion of all experiences and contact with others. In other words, we categorize and judge every person and very situation or place we come in contact with. Everything fits into categories in which we can simplify life so that we can easily assimilate the many experiences and contact with others that we will have in a lifetime. If we didn't do this, we would be overwhelmed and it would take far too long to judge each person and situation truly as individual and not based on our prior experiences. Life would be too overwhelming just as if we fear everything or don't fear anything- both are destructive ways of thought. To pre-judge circumstances and people, can help us differentiate between necessary fear and non-threatening, even if the fear doesn't amount to anything.
My other goal is to get this out in the open so that people aren't feeling guilty about having prejudice thoughts, but some judgement and preconceived notions are natural and help us stay safe and aware.
Suggested Reading
- Political Correctness Claims Another Victim
Now I am really fed up. Political Correctness has claimed another victim. This time it is a liberal; Juan Williams was fired by NPR for stating his opinion on Bill OReillys The OReilly Factor . NPR is... - Politically Correct or Too Sensitive?
You could interpret my introduction an explanation or a disclaimer because it's both. I am not shy about tackling tough topics because I thoroughly believe people don't learn unless challenged. When I tackle...
CommentsLoading...
hi izzy. always thought provoking. i didn't get to read it all but are we talking about predjudice or racial predjudice? we somewhat pre judge our environment because it acts in one way. fire, cold, fur,or a warm bath always react the same. we fear a lot on this planet and the basis for racial predjudice is due to a narrow, ill concieved view spread to create fear and seperate. stereotypes are created first to validate the predjudice. i'm hurrying through this . tell me if i'm wrong. i'll be back. this is interesting.i'll bring starbucks
Prejudice - a very interesting subject and I enjoyed reading this hub.
It's so easy for us to pre-judge or mis-judge individuals and we can easily and unfairly categorise someone if we're not careful but there are some in the line of their duty that have to be extremely vigilant and aware of certain individuals with criminal intent. If we judge someone correctly based on firm evidence then fine but if we misjudge someone because of unsound evidence then we're liable to be criticised for not being able to do our job properly or because we're prejudiced. A fine line between being the good guy and the bad guy.
Hollywood doesn't always help either. The industry can inadvertently reinforce prejudices. If most of us are open-minded then it's not so much of a problem but if not then a lot more people can suffer because of the influence of films related to a specific group of people.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
hi izzy, Another very interesting hub from one of my favorite hub writers.
My opinion, and lord knows I have a bunch of them, prejudice is something we and most animals were born with. It is a survival instinct imbedded in the brain at birth. What I mean by that is we humans, and animals, tend to stay within our own kind, and are wary of anyone who appears to be "different". Deer don't associate with wolves, at least for very long, and they know this. Racial prejudice was usually taught in the home and passed down from generation to generation. The Army was segregated between black and white for years. Fortunately, my parents were the opposite and taught us that prejudice is just wrong. Because of this, I have been able to make many friends with people of other races and cultures over my many years.
Now because of all the things going on in the world, we are once again getting very "suspicious" of anyone "different" than us. More of a type-casting situation than prejudice I think.
Great hub and certainly thought provoking.
Fascinating piece of writing. Is it prejudice or the accumulation of knowledge that puts us on guard? Whatever you wish to call it, it exists and it isn't blind. it is born of a proliferation of incidents that taken together put us on guard. If it makes us safer, so be it.
Very insightful Hub Izzetl. You are right that everyone has prejudice of all different sorts. This is only natural. We are faced constantly with many different experiences that we must adjust to. This often leads to a bias against something or someone. This can be good or bad. From there bigotry and intolerance against a certain group may develop. I wrote a Hub about this. My major premise is that it is natural and we must always be honest with ourselves and discuss this with others. The media loves to latch on to incidents and mine them for ratings. They never really delve into what underlies the incident. Examining our prejudices and being honest will help guard us from becoming bigoted and intolerant. You did this wonderfully and you obviously understand your feelings and sharing with others. That's what is important I believe.
I don't think a healthy cautionis quite the same as prejudice.
Good hub! I tend to agree that we all have heuristics that we use to determine, -quickly-, whether someone or something could be dangerous to us. Some base it on race, others base it on behavior/dress/actions. How did you find out about the indian sites copying your hubs? What did you do about it?
Interesting, and good observation, I agree with Pop and Poolman both,
A certain ammount of prejudice is included in "common sense" Going beyond that is bigotry. I love the way you handled this subject.
I don´t think prejudice is the same as racial discrimination. I can feel a bit nervous about white people that look as if they protest aginst the whole world too. It is more a survival instinct, not about religion or skin color. Great hub, as always from you!
Well stated!
There is a huge difference between a prejudice born of hatred and a prejudice that is as you say instinctive and protective as described in psychology as categorizing.
I was recently listening to a radio program where an overweight man was profiled and investigated because earlier that day a different overweight person was detained for concealing a weapon in the folds of his excess. There was no malice in selecting him but there was now a heightened awareness of how someone might conceal a weapon.
Its not to assume that every person that is heavy will do this but it is now a consideration previously not suspected.
You are correct it is wisdom to weigh and balance situations at times based on previous knowledge or experience.
favorite quote:
"Perhaps our prejudice for that culture is based on facts necessary to protect ourselves. I worry someday that Americans will be more afraid to believe they are prejudice than to act on a justifiable fears or instincts."
We just need to keep in mind to never let our "categorizing" become reasons to hate, belittle, or dehumanize.
This is not an incident of prejudice, even remotely.
If a fair amount of muslims are terrorists, and we have deadly proof of that, we should consider tracking any suspicious persons, including muslims.
In the Oregon incident it was the muslims at the mosque that contacted the FBI about his strange behavior.
Homeland Security and the FBI were not smart enough to find this plot on their own. So that gives you and idea on how safe they are keeping us, nine years after 911.
This political correctness is going to kill a lot of people.
Izette – This is exactly what prejudice is - "categorizing". We categorize snakes, spiders, lions, tigers, baboons, etc. as dangerous. We have to do that in order to protect ourselves.
There are certain common characteristics in the people of a nation – regardless of their color – that forces us to categorize the whole nation. Typical characteristic of whites is to oppress – they are born with the idea that they have superior rights on this earth; typical of the Indians is to be shrewd, unpredictable and cruel; typical of blacks is their idea that everything belong to them, and if not given to them, it should be unscrupulously taken by them.... and so we can go on and on.
To suppress our tendency to categorize, to stop being prejudicial, is one of the hardest things to do, because it means making ourselves vulnerable and open targets to whoever wants to harm us. I think practicing prejudice should be only a self-protecting tendency and not a tendency to humiliate, disregard and destroy others.
Great hub, voted UP and UP!
PS: I've just read the other comments - It seems to me that we are all very much in agreement with this issue.
Very good, interesting, valuable and thought-provoking hub, izettl. Definitely gets my high marks!
Certainly to have some pre-conceived expectations does not mean one cannot be open to exceptions and ready to accept new evidence. It is bigotry which must be questioned, - that state of mind when no matter who an individual IS who happens to be of a certain category, no matter how "otherwise" the person is, nor how much the other changes even personal objectionable behavior, the bigot will give no benefit of doubt nor deign to cast a clear look to see the PERSON or group beyond his own fixed ideas.
There is another word with a similar "bad rap" which I've championed. That is the word "discrimination". Of course we discriminate! If we prefer beef to chicken, blue to pink, Fords to Chevys, jeans to corduroys, we are simply discriminating. If we value good manners over churlishness and clean houses over dirty ones, we are discriminating. It is when discrimination, like bigotry, becomes so rigid that no exception can be made, no 'further look" and consideration can be given, that it is unreasonable and becomes detrimental. And it is especially detrimental when the favoritism involves one's children or in other relationships in which damaging psychological harm is done to a person due to being less-valued. This can be a delicate balance, because children have individual differences and may not all be lovable in identical ways. But each can be valued and loved for who he or she IS.
It's a bit like an old adage - to "be moderate about everything, including moderation" ! ha - ha Certainly a person needs to be alert and aware of the present situations and not be merely charging forth relying on rigid, fixed and often, blind, preconceptions.
Another excellent hub! This just reminded me that I have to finish watching the movie Crash -- I was kind of busy when I first tried watching it. I remember in my one psychology course how interesting it was to learn that we do stereotype and it's a natural tendency that protects our mind from being overwhelmed with a lot of information (as you mentioned). I also saw a documentary of some kind where it showed possible evidence for how the first snap judgments people made about others turned out to be right. I'm glad you addressed the most vexing part in that in our culture's determination to be politically correct, we sometimes don't like to look past what our accepted answer of right is. BTW, I happened to notice you are working on getting two books published...how awesome! You'll have to let me know when they get published so I can go out and buy them! :)
with this being the definition
An adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand or without knowledge or examination of the facts.
instinctive predjudice comes from whatever base it is that you pull from,fear or dislike but,arbitrarily fabricated. any predjudice beyond that is taught so as to "create" fear or dislike. an instinctive predjudice would create awareness which would eventually eliminate the predjudice. you would see that the view was based on nothing however, the taught predjudice would only work as a self fullfilling prophesy and this would be reciprocated which would only snowball it.
then this is what i found. i found predjudice only to be towards people.
Some researchers attribute prejudice to deep-rooted "fear of the stranger," while others cite religious or nationalist chauvinism, and fear of economic competition. Most, however, agree that prejudice is learned and can be reduced when members of different communities work together toward the realization of a common goal or when groups intermarry. so based on that i don't think it's a necessary evil.
I like your separating prejudice and bigotry, and I think your right that prejudice can be misunderstood, because of this association, and they are not always related. I also see your notion that it is our prejudices that help us to react in certain situations that can help us avoid danger. Very thoughtful writing!
I enjoyed the read and have to say I disagree, respectfully, with you. Prejudice is a judgement of another person based not on facts but on assumptions which might not be correct. So we see a Muslim person and assume that because they are Muslim they are a terrorist. This is dangerous on two levels. Firstly because it might lead us to ignore the real terrorist who is not a Muslim, or doesn't "look" like a Muslim. And so we get blown up, or whatever.
Secondly it is dangerous because we might treat a very peaceful, well-meaning person as a terrorist and turn them into someone with a grudge against us.
I agree that we have to be aware of potential threats, of that there is no doubt. However, to act on prejudice alone is not right, nor safe.
We all make decisions based on what we know and how we feel about what we know. That is normal.
Prejudice is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as "preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience" and the "unjust behaviour formed on such a basis."
The same dictionary gives the definition of bigot as "a person who is prejudiced in their views and intolerant of the opinions of others."
Interesting that just today an article in the local newspaper tells of a local author who, in an interview, said, “I don’t like black people.” She went on to say, “I don’t understand them! ... I know they are people just like me. I know they have the same rights as me. But I do not understand them. And then I do not like them. I avoid them because I am scared of them."
That is prejudice, and that is an evil, and a totally unnecessary one. That is the "fear of the stranger" that Joe Barnett mentioned in his comment above.
Thanks for the interesting read.
Love and peace
Tony
Laura,
I writing this second comment because I got to thinking about this thing some more .. and you. I consider you a friend, and I've gotten to know you pretty well over the last five months or so. Pregudice just doesn't square with your make up, so I had to make some sense of it all. I love your hub. Like all of your work, it makes folks think, but you may be just one degree off the mark on this one. Make that a half a degree. The possibility that I may be goofier than hell also exists.
When Toyota had the problem with Gas pedals sticking, sales went down. No one thought all Toyotas were bad, but no one knew which one's were which. When specific actions are tied to a specific person, group. or thing, human nature takes over. In the case of Muslims, that human nature is fear and self preservation. If three people get shot in three months driving down 42nd Street, guess what. You can bet I'm looking for another route home. I don't think all the people living on 42nd street killers and hate them. I'm just putting some distance between me and 42nd until they get the bad guys. I'm not pregudice againt Toyotas, Muslims, or folks on 42nd Street, but I'm not hanging with any of them until they get their act together.
jim
That's what I love about you sis! You truly are my female twin.
I'm not disagrreeing with you. Actually I'm just adding to your take I think Laura. Let's take this one a bit further. Okey? I'm talking about prejudice one word. and you're talking about healthy prejudice, two words. I would argue that healthy prejudice is an oxy moran.
prej·u·dice? ?/?pr?d??d?s/ Show Spelled
[prej-uh-dis] Show IPA
noun, verb, -diced, -dic·ing.
–noun
1. an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason.
2. any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable.
3. unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group
I agree with everything you say. It's just a play on words. I just don't think we're talking prejudice in this situation. I think we need to come up with a new word for it. ummmmmm .. how's bout prejulation? That's it! I'm inclined to be very prejulated these days.
In any case, I love your stuff, and this was good. Hope everything's going well your way. I've had a tragedy happen in my life. I'll tell you about it sometime in a different venue. Send up a generic prayer for me kid!
jim
jim
jim
I have no idea where the two added Jims came from. How embarrising. (laughing)
>"Typical characteristic of whites is to oppress – they are born with the idea that they have superior rights on this earth; typical of the Indians is to be shrewd, unpredictable and cruel; typical of blacks is their idea that everything belong to them, and if not given to them, it should be unscrupulously taken by them.... and so we can go on and on."<
It seems to me here that you have just illustrated the definition of stereotyping.
I may have a prejudice or bias to the Bears over the Packers, or Auburn over Alabama, that's hardly the same as a racial prejudice that so far all I'm seeing here in the article and the comments, is a lot of what is called justificationism. What justifies the prejudice toward an entire race for the actions of a small selection of that group?
The author of; "In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas." seems to me to be looking for justification for his own prejudice in order to make himself feel good about something that is actually unjustifiable. All whites are not out to oppress people, all blacks can't dunk, all Jews aren't rich, and all muslims aren't terrorists. Broad sweeping generalizations are simply logical fallacies that allow people to feed their own fears and feel justified in doing so. It also breeds contempt and feeds hatred.In fact, we can see it politically dividing the country today. All conservatives are dumb rednecks and all liberals are traitors and anti-American. How does adding to the already existing polarization in this country by fanning the flames of prejudice provide a benefit to us as a nation? Frankly the idea of living in fear is not very appealing as a political position.
I gave this an up and an awesome. How have I not found you before now?! This hub is fascinating and incredible!
I just finished an intro to Philosophy class that scratched the surface of what you are talking about. I am bookmarking this one!
You are awesome!
adagio 4369,
To begin with, justificationism isn't a word. You missed the whole point, and while doing it you lumped the author and all the rest of us into one pile. That's what you seem to be against.
I'm all about putting issues aside that divide our country. That's what my organization stands on. In a perfect world profiling would be bad, and socialism would be good, but this isn't a perfect world. This is the real world. If you find yourself sitting on an airplane next to someone wearing a turbine and wrapped in a sheet, and you don't have just a teeny bit of aprehension, you are truly special. Fear and paranoia are two different things. Fear is necessary to survival. The Bible teaches us about healthy fear.
I know the person who wrote this hub. She is intelligent, educated, and has a heart as big as Wyoming. Read between the lines and you'll find she's onto something here. She's genuine and has a lot of guts for coloring outside the box.
If you debate me, do so line by line, and don't color it with ideologys. I imagine you are a pretty decent person, but your tone is arrogant I'm sorry to say. By the way, don't read my stuff, you'll have a stroke.
jim
Laura, of course I agree. The person who says they have no prejudice is a liar. What's important is that you minimize (oops there's that word) and control pregudice to the point that it's a productive thing. I know what you're saying, I just had to pull your pony tail!
jim
Well Laura, you knew you kicked the hornet's nest with this one!
You are right, prejudice is a survival thing, a trait all species use as a shortcut method of analyzing a situation to avoid potential dangers or discomforts.
Instict, education and experience contribute so we recognize things we would better steer clear of.
Animals recognize a predatory posture and take it as a cue to run. Birds leave a certain butterfly alone because it has evolved to resemble a Monarch butterfly which tastes terrible to birds. The birds have developed a prejudice and the false Monarchs take advantage.
Body language, clothing and facial expressions direct us when we do something as simple as choose which person on the street to ask for directions. Given a group of senior citizens we avoid the prune-faced frowning character and approach the pleasant looking grinning Granny because we pre-judged the situation.
The thing is, we humans generaly aspire to rise above our animal instincts and primal urges. We seek to be rational, open minded, tolerant and to not jump to conclusions.
I site this example: My wife, no matter how often she gets burned, insists on believing the best of people...that they are basically good-hearted and honest. On the other hand, I tell her that I assume all people are a**holes until they prove different...and I am far less often disappointed.
Prejudice may be abhorant,but it can be handy!
We can't deny our predispositions, but we can endeavor to limit the influence they have in our lives. The first step in dealing with an undesirable trait is to recognize it's existance.
Thanks for braving this touchy subject.
CP
"Perhaps our prejudice for that culture is based on what is necessary to protect ourselves. I worry someday that Americans will be more afraid to believe they are prejudice than to act on a justifiable fears or instincts."
Ah the pendulum swings of Society.
"Prejudice" means to "pre-judge". Now this "jumping to conclusions because..." seems to be a good thing, at least in current times.
Once upon a century or two ago, there was a British King (named George). He got mad at American colonists (merchants) for not paying their royalty taxes on rum and tea (staples in colonial America...big business for both sides of the atlantic).
So King George sent British troops into Boston to find the merchants and the rest of that "rabble" who dumped British cargo overboard as a protest against His Majesty's tax.
The King's troops found some the American dealers in rum and tea; broke into their homes; trashed the place looking for contriband; arrested men, women and children; some of whom got shipped back to Britain for trial.
How did the British troops decide which houses to break into?
-The people looked like prosperous merchants.
So the troops took their prejudice against merchants as a guide telling them who to oppress and imprison.
Despite the cleverness of the logic in your hub...prejudice is still wrong.
Prejudice catches up the innocent with the evil. It punishes both. There's nothing brave about King George imprisoning folks because they look like merchants.
There's nothing warm and patriotic about exchanging fear of immigrants or outsiders for prejudice and wrongful treatment. Since when does America stand for the schoolyard bully?...ignorant and proud of his prejudice against the weak.
I do hear and understand why sensible people use presuppositions for self protection.
But fear need not be our natural state. The likelihood of my being the personal victim of a terrorist attack is so remote...I'm more likely to win the Powerball Lottery when it's in the hundreds of millions.
So my fear of militants, Islamic folks or Pakistani cab drivers is totally unfounded by the real world.
Our fears are most often based on prejudices which are also un-founded.
The woman afraid to walk through a black neighborhood is a callback to the prejudice that black men rape white women. Would she also fear walking through a Jewish neighborhood? Swedish? Lithuanian?
The stereotypes that support unfounded fears are based on prejudices..most of which harken back to before we were born.
As far as "gut reactions" are concerned: every young child's "gut reaction" to sharing is "No! It's mine!" .
But children are trained to overcome their first thoughts (selfish thoughts) and learn to accept the socially more acceptable path called..sharing. Not a particularly popular thing among little kids, lol.
And so it can be with fears. By facing our fears we stand...able to act with courage and civility. By accepting our fears we capitulate; we shrink back from squaring up against them.
The risks against most Americans today from folks outside the country are miniscule. The fears and dread we face is mostly drummed up by the rodeo clowns in the media chasing bull shouting about how the sky is falling. It's hard to hear the birds in America. There's just too many Chicken Little's running around.
America is the most powerful nation in the world. We have no fear for any nation to do us serious harm.
America is a multi-cultural place. We need not fear the nations who live amongst us as friends and neighbors.
The greatest fear is the unknown. It is our personal prejudices that paint the picture of what the unknown might be. Funny, how it's always wrong about guessing the future.
You certainly stirred up a hornet's nest with this hub! I have enjoyed the comments as much as the hub. Some examples of "prejudice" are actually examples of using common sense. I do not open my door unless I know who is knocking. I do not walk alone down a dark street at night. I don't think these are examples of prejudice.
Izetti, I am not claiming to be without prejudice, even though I have tried not to be. As a teacher I did not look up the records of my students because I did not want to pre-judge them. Many of my colleagues did this. Raised in Kentucky, I got in trouble with my parents when they discovered I had been dancing with blacks at church camp.
Several years ago, after going to an off-Broadway play in New York City, I could not find a cab and had to walk all the way back to my hotel alone, I was terrified. I guess that was prejudice. I mean, after all, I did not get mugged. (I also chose not to go off Broadway again!)
I live in a safe neighborhood, but I have been reading too many stories about older people in safe neighborhoods getting robbed or mugged or even raped that I have decided to play it safe. If that is prejudice, then so be it.
Hey Izzy, sorry to be so late getting to the party. First kudos again for your solid, unabashed penchant for topics that really mean something. You hit on one of my favorite subjects which I covered (In the most unlikely of hubs: Jesus Won't Stay Where You Put Him) In that hub I talked about a Greek word diakrino that roughly means to discriminate or judge rightly between things.
I notice that you seem to feel that prejudice is preferable to discrimination. That in itself is funny because to discriminate is merely the ability to tell if the light is red or green and thus safe to cross the street or between things that are hot or cold and thus safe to pick up or drop back on the stove. What is funny is that the word has gotten a bum rap because of how we apply that discrimination of the colors of races.
We have become "prejudiced" about the word discrimination. I believe the problem is not in the words but the choices we make based on the information we glean from those God-given abilities to sort out things or people. Deacons are derived from the word diakrino and are people valued because they have the maturity to judge situations when necessary and provide leadership. The problem is this--Peter wanted to walk on water like Jesus was doing and Jesus (probably chuckling to himself as he did so) said "Sure, come on." Peter does alright for a while until he looks around at the waves and wind and starts to sink. Jesus pulled him out and said these significant words: "You were doing well, why did you 'diakrino'?" We translated the word as doubt, but he was merely pointing out that since Peter was involved in an obviously supernatural experience, why apply the general rules of judgment about the waves and relative densities etc. to this situation.
In other words, if we want to make it in a world of dangerous or unpleasant situations, we have to learn to pick carefully the times we apply our prejudice or discrimination or judgment. We "sink or walk" in relationships as we apply our knowledge in a courageous and trusting manner.
One: Is there more going on here than my predispositions can explain or predict?
Two: Will it affect my future relationship with this person?
Three: Would I want the same standards applied to me?
Thank you for beginning and hosting yet another significant and thought provoking hub. =:)
Laura, I go away for a couple of days and look what has happened! I guess Jim was here to take up for you while I was gone, but then it doesn't appear that you need help in the intelligence department!
Voted up and useful. Good read. Thanks for sharing.
Great write.
The man that does not harbor predjudice is the man who sees neither good nor evil or even worse, it does not concern him.
I agree with this even though people may view some of this as being politically incorrect. It's all true and put in a genuine way that you are known for. Great hub izettl.
Great hub!



































TheManWithNoPants Level 7 Commenter 17 months ago
Excellent work izettl. The boys up in Boston are busy building the Housefire Project web site, but I've got the simple little "themanwithnopants.com" thing. I've got a place called politics and links in the No Pants thing, and would like to put in a link to your last piece on the economy. As you know I really liked it. If you find a moment, let me know.
jim